Operation Sindoor at UN: India Blasts Pakistan’s ‘False’ Claims as ‘Single-Point Agenda to Harm India’

'Single point agenda – to harm India': New Delhi calls out Pak’s 'false' claims on Op Sindoor at UN

The diplomatic battlefield between India and Pakistan flared up once again at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), this time over the contentious issue of Operation Sindoor. In a sharp and unambiguous rebuttal, India’s Permanent Representative, Parvathaneni Harish, dismantled Pakistan’s version of events, calling it not just inaccurate, but part of a malicious, singular objective: to harm India [[6]].

Table of Contents

What is Operation Sindoor and Why Did India Launch It?

Operation Sindoor was a decisive military action launched by India in May 2025. This operation was a direct and calibrated response to a devastating terrorist attack in Pahalgam in April 2025, which claimed numerous innocent lives [[1]]. Indian intelligence agencies swiftly traced the planning and execution of the Pahalgam attack back to terrorist infrastructure located across the border in Pakistan.

The operation itself was described by Indian officials as a targeted strike against these specific terrorist launch pads and command centers, aimed at degrading their ability to carry out future attacks on Indian soil. It was framed not as an act of aggression, but as a necessary measure of self-defense under international law, a right enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter [[4]].

Pakistan Brings Operation Sindoor to the UN

In the aftermath of the operation, Pakistan sought to take its case to the international stage. At a recent UNSC meeting, the Pakistani envoy presented its own account of Operation Sindoor, attempting to portray India as the aggressor and casting the military action in a negative light [[7]].

Pakistan’s narrative, according to Indian officials, was a deliberate attempt to muddy the waters and shift the focus away from its own role as a state sponsor of terrorism. By bringing the issue to the UN, Islamabad hoped to garner international sympathy and potentially isolate India diplomatically [[3]].

India’s Fiery Rebuttal at the UNSC

India’s response, delivered by Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, was swift, scathing, and left no room for ambiguity. He directly accused the Pakistani envoy of presenting a “false and self-serving” version of events [[2]].

Harish’s core argument was that Pakistan’s entire stance was built on a foundation of deceit. He emphasized that the world had already condemned the Pahalgam terror attack, implicitly recognizing its origin. Therefore, Pakistan’s subsequent attempt to condemn India’s defensive response was seen as hypocritical and illogical [[4]].

He went further, stating that Pakistan’s actions at the UN were not about seeking justice or peace, but were driven by a “single point agenda – to harm India” [[6]]. This powerful phrase captured the essence of India’s position: that Pakistan’s foreign policy, particularly regarding India, is fundamentally adversarial and destructive.

The Strategic Context of the India-Pakistan Clash

This diplomatic spat must be understood within the broader, decades-long context of India-Pakistan relations. Key points include:

  • Kashmir Dispute: India firmly asserted that Pakistan has “no locus standi” on the issue of Jammu and Kashmir, a region India considers an integral part of its territory [[9]].
  • State Sponsorship of Terrorism: India consistently maintains that Pakistan uses terrorist groups as a tool of its foreign policy, a charge that forms the bedrock of its defense of operations like Sindoor [[5]].
  • Diplomatic Isolation of Pakistan: India’s strategy has been to highlight Pakistan’s role in global terrorism forums, aiming to diplomatically isolate its neighbor and delegitimize its narratives on the world stage [[8]].

Global Reactions and the Road Ahead

While the immediate reaction from other UNSC members was muted, India’s forceful presentation likely resonated with nations that have themselves been victims of cross-border terrorism. The clear linkage of Operation Sindoor to the Pahalgam attack provides a strong legal and moral justification for India’s actions.

For Pakistan, the challenge remains to move beyond its traditional narrative and address the international community’s concerns about its alleged support for militant groups. Until then, its attempts to challenge India’s defensive actions at forums like the UN are likely to be met with skepticism.

Conclusion: A Clear Message from New Delhi

India’s robust rejection of Pakistan’s claims on Operation Sindoor at the UN was more than just a diplomatic counter; it was a strategic declaration. It sent a clear message that India will not only defend its citizens with military precision but will also aggressively defend its narrative and interests on the global stage. The phrase “single-point agenda to harm India” has now become a defining label for how New Delhi views its neighbor’s hostile intentions, setting the tone for future engagements.

Sources

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top