The high-stakes poker game for the soul of Hollywood just got a lot more intense. In a direct and scathing rebuke, Netflix co-CEO Greg Peters has officially labeled Paramount Skydance’s $108 billion hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) as fundamentally flawed and unrealistic . The core of his criticism? An unsustainable mountain of debt that would cripple the combined company from day one.
Table of Contents
- The Two Rival Offers: A Financial Showdown
- Why Netflix is Calling the Paramount Bid “Unrealistic”
- Netflix’s All-Cash Strategy and Shareholder Momentum
- The Larry Ellison Factor and Geopolitical Financing
- Regulatory Hurdles and the Future of Streaming
- Conclusion
- Sources
The Two Rival Offers: A Financial Showdown
The battle for WBD has split into two distinct camps, each with a radically different financial philosophy.
On one side is Paramount Skydance, backed by Oracle founder Larry Ellison. They’ve thrown down a staggering $108.4 billion all-cash offer, valuing WBD at $30 per share . This bid is a classic hostile takeover attempt, designed to derail the existing agreement between WBD and Netflix.
On the other side is Netflix, which has strategically upgraded its initial proposal to a robust $82.7 billion all-cash deal, offering $27.75 per share . While the headline number is lower, Netflix’s offer is built on a foundation of financial stability and operational synergy.
Why Netflix is Calling the Paramount Bid “Unrealistic”
Greg Peters didn’t mince words. He argued that the Paramount bid is a house of cards, primarily because it relies on an enormous $55 billion in new debt to finance the acquisition . To put that in perspective, this would leave the newly merged Paramount-WBD entity with a total debt burden of around $87 billion—a figure the WBD board itself has cited as a major risk concern .
“It doesn’t pass the sniff test,” Peters reportedly stated, emphasizing that such a debt load would severely limit the company’s ability to invest in new content, a critical lifeline in the streaming wars . This strategy prioritizes short-term acquisition over long-term creative health, a point Netflix is hammering home to WBD shareholders.
Netflix’s All-Cash Strategy and Shareholder Momentum
In stark contrast, Netflix’s revised all-cash offer is being pitched as the safe, certain, and strategically sound choice. By removing any stock component, Netflix has eliminated market volatility as a risk factor for WBD shareholders .
This move appears to be working. Peters has expressed confidence that Netflix is “on track to win Warner Bros Discovery shareholder support” for its deal . The company has even suggested an “accelerated” timeline for a shareholder vote, potentially within three months, signaling strong internal momentum .
Netflix’s argument is simple: their offer provides immediate, guaranteed value without saddling the combined company with a debt millstone around its neck.
The Larry Ellison Factor and Geopolitical Financing
Behind the Paramount bid is the formidable tech billionaire Larry Ellison, who has taken a controlling stake in Paramount through his investment vehicle. His personal wealth is a key pillar of the offer, but it’s not the only source. Reports indicate that the financing package also includes significant capital from sovereign wealth funds in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi .
While this provides the necessary cash, it introduces a layer of geopolitical complexity that could further complicate the already daunting regulatory approval process. Regulators in both the U.S. and Europe are likely to scrutinize foreign state-backed ownership of a major American media asset with extreme caution.
Regulatory Hurdles and the Future of Streaming
Both deals face a gauntlet of regulatory scrutiny. Paramount’s legal team has already begun arguing that the Netflix-WBD merger is “presumptively unlawful” and anti-competitive . However, Netflix’s counter-argument is that combining their global streaming platform with WBD’s legendary content library (HBO, Warner Bros. Studios, DC Comics, etc.) creates a stronger competitor to Disney and Amazon, not a monopoly .
The ultimate decision may come down to which deal regulators believe is more likely to succeed as a viable, long-term business. A company drowning in $87 billion of debt is a far riskier proposition than one with a solid balance sheet, making Netflix’s case potentially more persuasive to antitrust authorities.
Conclusion
The fight for Warner Bros. Discovery is more than just a corporate takeover; it’s a referendum on the future of the entertainment industry. Netflix’s dismissal of the Paramount bid as “unrealistic” is a calculated message to shareholders and regulators alike: financial engineering and massive debt are no substitute for a stable, strategic vision. With its all-cash offer gaining traction and a clear narrative of creative synergy, Netflix appears to be in the driver’s seat. But in the unpredictable world of Hollywood megadeals, the final act is yet to be written.
Sources
- Times of India: Netflix rejects Paramount’s offer; says it has nothing else other than Oracle founder Ellison’s …
- Bloomberg / Reuters: Paramount Launches Hostile $108 Billion Bid for Warner Bros. Discovery [[8], [11]]
- Variety: Netflix CEOs Defend Warner Bros. Deal in Memo to Staff
- [INTERNAL_LINK:streaming-wars-2026]
- [INTERNAL_LINK:warner-bros-discovery-financials]