Adviser or Adversary? US Tech Firm Sues Over $5.2M Acquisition Gone Wrong

Deal gone wrong: US tech company drags acquisition adviser to court; alleges fee-driven bad advice

When a tech company sets out to acquire another business, it usually hires an M&A adviser to navigate the minefield of due diligence, valuation, and integration. But what happens when that trusted adviser allegedly leads you straight into a financial crater? That’s exactly the nightmare facing SmarTek21, a US-based tech firm now locked in a high-stakes acquisition lawsuit against its former advisory partner, TGP GP Management.

At the heart of the legal battle is SmarTek21’s $5.2 million purchase of IT Avalon—a deal that, according to court filings, was rushed through despite glaring red flags about the target company’s financial health. Now, just months later, SmarTek21 claims it’s pouring additional cash into the struggling acquisition just to keep it afloat. The company alleges TGP prioritized its own transaction fees over sound, ethical advice—a charge the advisory firm vehemently denies.

Table of Contents

According to court documents filed in a California federal court, SmarTek21 engaged TGP GP Management in early 2024 to advise on its strategic expansion through acquisitions. TGP identified IT Avalon, an IT services provider, as a prime target. Despite internal concerns raised by SmarTek21’s finance team about IT Avalon’s inconsistent cash flow and outdated client contracts, the deal was finalized within weeks.

Post-acquisition, the reality set in: IT Avalon’s financials were far worse than represented. SmarTek21 alleges it has since injected hundreds of thousands of dollars just to maintain operations—money it claims it never would have spent had TGP provided honest, thorough analysis.

What Is an Acquisition Lawsuit—and Why Does It Matter?

An acquisition lawsuit typically arises when one party in a merger or acquisition claims they were misled, defrauded, or given negligent advice that led to financial harm. These cases are notoriously complex, often hinging on fine print in engagement letters, the scope of due diligence, and whether fiduciary duties were breached.

While M&A advisers aren’t insurers of a deal’s success, they are legally obligated to act in their client’s best interest. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and various state laws hold financial advisers to a fiduciary or suitability standard—meaning they must avoid conflicts of interest and ensure recommendations are appropriate .

As noted by the Investopedia guide on M&A, “The adviser’s role is not to guarantee outcomes, but to provide a clear-eyed assessment of risks and rewards.” If SmarTek21 can prove TGP ignored or downplayed those risks to secure a fee, it could set a significant legal precedent.

Red Flags Ignored, Says SmarTek21

SmarTek21’s complaint outlines several specific concerns it says were raised but dismissed:

  • IT Avalon’s revenue had declined for three consecutive quarters.
  • Key clients were on month-to-month contracts with no long-term commitments.
  • Its technology stack was outdated, requiring immediate modernization.
  • Internal audits revealed discrepancies in reported EBITDA figures.

“We explicitly asked TGP to delay the deal for deeper forensic accounting,” the lawsuit states. “Instead, we were told the ‘window of opportunity’ was closing and that waiting could cost us the deal—and them their fee.”

TGP Responds: “We Did Our Due Diligence”

TGP GP Management has issued a strong public denial. In a statement, the firm said it “conducted comprehensive due diligence in line with industry standards” and that SmarTek21 was fully briefed on all material facts before signing.

“The combined entity has a strong strategic rationale and long-term growth potential,” the statement added. “Post-acquisition integration challenges are common in the tech sector and do not constitute adviser malpractice.”

TGP also hinted that SmarTek21 may be using the lawsuit as a tactic to avoid post-closing obligations, a common counter-narrative in such disputes.

The Broader Lessons for Tech Companies

This case is a wake-up call for growing tech firms considering acquisitions. The M&A advisory space is booming, but not all advisers are created equal. Some boutique firms operate on thin margins and may be incentivized to close deals quickly to earn their success fee—a classic conflict of interest.

Key takeaways include:

  • Never outsource your judgment. An adviser informs—you decide.
  • Insist on independent financial and legal reviews, even if your adviser says it’s unnecessary.
  • Scrutinize the adviser’s compensation structure. Are they paid only on deal closure? [INTERNAL_LINK:choosing-ma-adviser]

How to Protect Yourself in an M&A Deal

To avoid falling into a similar trap, consider these best practices:

  1. Define clear engagement terms: Specify what “due diligence” means in your contract.
  2. Require third-party validation: Hire your own forensic accountants.
  3. Build in earn-outs or holdbacks: Tie part of the purchase price to future performance.
  4. Document all concerns: Keep a written record of every red flag raised internally.

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for the Tech Ecosystem

The acquisition lawsuit between SmarTek21 and TGP GP Management is more than a corporate squabble—it’s a stark reminder that in the high-stakes world of M&A, trust must be verified, not assumed. As tech companies increasingly turn to acquisitions for growth, they must remember: a deal that’s rushed is often a deal regretted. This case may well become a textbook example of why due diligence isn’t a box to check—it’s the foundation of smart strategy.

Sources

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top